Top of her game
WORDS JENNY RUDD PHOTOS TRACIE HEASMAN
A PLAN TO START A FAMILY AND GET TO THE TOP OF HER GAME PROFESSIONALLY SEES MARY HILL BECOME THE NEWEST PARTNER AT TAURANGA LAW FIRM, COONEY LEES MORGAN, SUPPORTED BY HUSBAND MATT AND SONS LUCA AND MITCH.
Itās not the first time Mary has been offered the position. Eight years ago, she was taken out for a coffee with then partner, Paul Cooney. āPaul knew that Matt and I had been going through IVF to try and start a family. He was very supportive. That morning, Paul asked me if Iād like to become partner, and I said, āI have some news to share with you too!ā
āAlthough I knew Cooney Lees Morgan would have been happy for me to be a partner while I had babies, I felt that it was a special family time. I also knew that if I wanted to make partner in the future, then I would. There were people who told me I was crazy to let the opportunity go, and that it wouldnāt come round again. But my feeling was, if I wanted to make it happen then it would. I felt relaxed about waiting, and had faith in Cooneyās. I had seen that they treat people really well. When it comes to looking after their staff, and in particular mums, they always think long-term. Iām in a good place right now ā the kids are happy, the youngest has been at school for a year, we have built a new home. Now feels like the right time to become a partner.ā
MAKING THE MOVE
It was that desire to have a family, and to work in an environment where Mary could succeed whilst raising children, which drew the couple to Cooney Lees Morgan. āI had been working in competition law, doing high court negotiations in Auckland. Matt was working for Mercury Energy in a corporate role. Matt and I are both from Auckland, and it never occurred to me that weād live anywhere else. But even then, 13 years ago, it felt busy and big. We started to look at places like Nelson, Hawkeās Bay and Tauranga.ā
A connection to Sally Powdrell, chairperson of partners at the firm, convinced Mary to make the move. āI was offered a role in resource management ā quite different from the competition law Iād been practising. But there were three big clinchers for me. One was Sally; sheās just amazing. Sheād been made partner in her twenties, and although her children are now young adults, she was able to work part-time while they were teenagers, when she felt they needed her most. The second was that I could see the firm were driven to support community initiatives and play a role in building the community. The third was that they seemed to be a very happy group of lawyers. Thatās a good sign when you are looking at committing to a firm! So, Matt and I made the move.ā
āWe had been living on Franklin Road in Ponsonby. We loved it, apart from at Christmas when we had to buy a load of cheap lights to stop our neighbours being angry with us. Every day another bulb went. By the end of the holiday, we were a pretty sorry sight. We could see people pointing and laughing at our efforts as they walked past!ā
NEW GIRL
Mary is a ātake-the-bull-by-the-hornsā kind of girl, which is lucky. She needed to learn, not only the different ways of doing things at her new firm, but also another area of law. āPaul Cooney had never had a junior before, but he turned out to be a brilliant mentor. He took me to every single meeting and upskilled me. There was all this new information to absorb. About a month into it, there was a hearing, and he chucked me straight into it! But I felt really supported, and so just got stuck in and had a go. Itās the way I approach most things.
āI was getting practical experience too: more so than with a big firm. I enjoyed being a junior to two QCs because I was able to go to the Court of Appeal and watch and learn about that side of things. In Auckland, I hadnāt run my own trials, but now I have four to six hearings a year. There have been two already this year. I had a three-week hearing when Luca, my eldest, was six weeks old. I presented my clientās case for four days, then a member from my team sat through the rest of the hearing. Good communication amongst my team meant we gave our client the best possible service.ā
Most of the partners are from Auckland or Wellington. I ask Mary if she misses the big smoke, but she shakes her head. āWe love it here, and the kids are thriving. In every way, itās exceeded our expectations. I wanted to be able to make a life here and still be in litigation. Hearings are āfull onā, and you need to be on your game to respond to everything that is thrown at you. Otherwise you end up looking like an idiot. In Auckland, thereās no way I could have had a family life with Matt and the children, and prepared properly for hearings. It would have been logistically impossible. Here in the Bay, our hearings are at the Twin Towers in The Mount: really close to my house! I can have a coffee at Slowfish, spend the morning at the hearing, take my client out for lunch, head back in, then go for a run around the Mount afterwards. It is infinitely better than battling through a sticky and swelling city to do the same job.ā
PRESENTEEISM
Itās hard to believe the extent to which Maryās firm make it possible for the parents to work around raising children. Old, established law firms arenāt renowned for making concessions like that, but itās deep in Cooneyās culture to be supportive of their staff. āWhen my children were tiny, I was able to work two days a week for a couple of years. Thatās virtually unheard of in our industry. I was still running hearings, my RMA practice and negotiating, and Cooneyās were happy to make it work. I shared a nanny with a colleague. If we had to go to a meeting together, which was not unusual, the nanny would look after all the children.ā
āRecently I was up in Auckland at a conference with a group of young lawyers. They talked about the prevalence of āpresenteeismā at work. Itās the show of being constantly present and available at work, even if there isnāt anything to do. We discussed how damaging that culture is. It doesnāt get the best out of lawyers, so ultimately doesnāt do the best for the clients. Itās such an antiquated way of working, and one that we really donāt support.ā
EXPECTATIONS
This culture of open-minded trust has a real effect on the work produced. āWe are a pragmatic bunch. Weād much rather pick up the phone and have a quick chat than send out a waffly five-page letter. Because of that, we have built a good reputation both as a legal practice and employer. We have some big clients, like Zespri, Milford Asset Management, and Norske Skog Tasman, who like the way we work and choose us over the big city legal firms from Auckland or Wellington.ā
THE JUGGLE
Mary is a bit of a superwoman. I asked her how a normal day looks: it canāt be easy having two small children and being at the top of your game professionally. She is incredibly fit and likes to do sunrise yoga then go for a run. If she has extra work on because of a hearing, itās all done early in the morning. āThen it means I can do the school run. Thatās my time to see how my boys are doing, and chat to the teachers. I usually get to work around 9.30 am, which is also good as I miss the traffic over the bridge. By the time I get home in the early evening to relieve the nanny, Iām done. Evenings are for Netflix!ā
Maryās favourite spots
Dinner: Burger Fuel, then Pilot Bay with Matt and the children
Glass of wine: On my new deck!
Clothes: I always shop at The Mount ā Sisters & Co, Wallis, and North Beach
Run: The Rotorua lakes
Downtime: I belong to a cool book club, where we do anything apart from read books. We go for walks, have cooking lessons, and do anything else we can think of!